I am so angry at blogspot right now. Seriously, the adjustments they made to the layouts are weird. And before they righted them into correct sizes (which I STILL don't like, by the way) I spent TWO hours trying to figure out what I did wrong and how to fix my beautiful layout... and it turns out it wasn't me! Anyhow... *grumbles* I don't have much topic to blog on, so I decided instead to do a quote blog. I doubt anyone will read it through/comment, but it's more for me anyhow. This won't include quotes from me/my events/days personally, but mostly quotes from my favorite books, authors, movies, etc. If you don't care, feel free to minus the window at any time. For the rest of you... wow, you musn't have homework (or you do and you're... you know, not doing it).
C.C.: I wouldn't be caught dead in that dress.
Niles: You'd have to be dead six months to fit in it.
Max: I'm going to ask Fran to sign a prenuptial agreement.
Niles: [deadpan] Why don't you just walk through downtown Iraq dressed like Uncle Sam. It'll be quicker
Scratch that:
I had actually gone to bed, turned out the lights and began to drift off when I began thinking about books. And something struck me! Now this may not be original, but I had never stopped to think about it before. I began to contemplate the Bella’s, Nora’s, Aislynn’s, Ever’s, etc of the world. And, more importantly, what made their love interest so appealing. But I could not ponder on this far enough before I came to think of the authors, and not necessarily the doe-eyed protagonist herself. And so from here it was concluded that:
I think the authors are maybe living out unfulfilled fantasies through their characters. Because it’s always the boy everyone wants that these girls get, you know? The handsome, rich, mysterious heartthrob hiding a deep, dark secret. And sometimes he’s just a plain out jerk, and yet he is idolized in the eyes of all as gifted and wonderful because of all of those things. Yet it is those things - the looks, money, mystery - that are not of this making. They are endowed on him from elsewhere. Anyhow, you should know my feelings on the paranormal teen hunk. So, basically he’s a lucky jerk who happens to get the stupid girl, because smart girls know that these boys are NOT OK.
So, I really think that the authors have some unrealized dream of being the beacon to this type of man. He is so sought after and there is a sea of girls chasing him. Yet to be that one girl in his eyes, though you may be plain, slow and not altogether beautiful, would be an event indeed. And I can certainly see the appeal of these books, yet I can’t help but think they might prove detrimental for the young adult state-of-mind. It is teaching us to be accepting of odd, and sometimes forceful, behavior. After all, he’s a handsome/vampire, so it’s totally OK. You can fix him.
Girls should be looking for the boys who, though they may not be the Sage to our Clea, will care for us and love us. They will not command us, control us and attempt to murder us for access back into heaven (see Hush, Hush). Just, don’t look for Edward, Patch, Sage, Keenan, etc - the list is ever-spanning - when you have the one who is never named in the book right there, being great and wonderful without a secret supernatural identity, winning looks and a safe stashed with gold.
*sigh* I didn’t see this coming.
Anyhow, I really need to be off to bed. G’night!
Quote blog to be resumed at a later time. Occasionally my soapbox gains the upper hand.
Toodle Pip.
"Sage to our Clea" hahahahahaahaha!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteSeriously..I think this is so true!! Good thoughts on the topic. Good thoughts indeed Ms. [snider]Wicks.
The nice guy never seems to get to win the day. Maybe it's a desire to tame the wild man, to fix the bad boy, that drives women to write that way...which I think could have something to do with the fall of creation and the roles women were originated to play...oh, but it's too late at night for me to articulate that thought out fully.
I also think the authors that use these types - well, it just shows their lack of skill. Because it's hard to make a nice guy truly interesting, with depth and appeal, through writing. The skillful authors who do this do this quite well. Which is why I was a bit upset w/ Suzanne Collins for taking an easy out w/ a tormented demented Peeta in Mockingjay...but I digress.
For examples of nice guys done right, see Po in "Graceling". Or Dexter from "This Lullaby" by Sarah Dessen. Dexter more came to my mind actually. A truly nice person, a sound, solid young guy with morals. But yet he STILL HAS COMPLEXITY! Which, honestly, Edward just never did have.
Also, I think the nice guys deserve a better rap! All these bad boys in YA are polluting the reader's mind, in my opinion. Like what we were talking about today - that one nice guy we know ;) - they are really the best kind. I'm looking for a solely nice guy. and that doesn't mean he'll be boring as a cucumber. It just means he will be inherently GOOD.
*end of my contribution to your soapbox*
P.S. I REALLY REALLY like your current banner! So fits into your blog title!!
ReplyDeleteYou wouldn't imagine the brilliant thoughts I have at midnight. Except, never would I, for they're gone by the morning unless I write them down. Which is why I got up to blog, Rebecca Snider [Wicks]. I mean, if the nice guy ALWAYS won, things would be plain boring. And I guess you can't help who you like, but it's fairly apparent that the heroine and hero of YA novels are empty vessels for unfulfilled wishes. Honestly, when a character is defined by "handsome, rich, vampire/immortal/whatever" and not by any kind of CHARACTER (which is why they are called characters), you know there's a problem.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, any of the guys from YA novels I listed in my blog, I can't think of a single way to describe them otherwise... except for dangerous/mysterious/aloof. How is that okay?
I thought of Po and Dexter as I was writing, and Peeta too. I'm sorry, those three novels/series are excellent books without being empty husks with rampant hormones and are still just plain old humans. As for the events of Mockingjay, I think towards the end I would have to disagree. He still had the problem with the brainwashing from time to time, and so he changed, but it was portrayed negatively. His sudden outbursts, in the final chapter, were clearly seen as something he would have to live with.
That didn't make him more interesting or appealing. And in any case, I'm sure a lot of people were rooting for Gale, since he would fit slightly into the jerk/handsome/talented bunch; granted there is more to him. I'm just generalizing there.
Anyhow, back to nice/interesting boys: I think even Brigan fits into this for me. He's the younger brother, not as handsome as Nash and really doesn't care for being in the royal line at all. And he's a total jerk to Fire at first, which would be hint one for the bad boy club, but his reasons were legitimate. And Fire wasn't the Clea to his Sage. She wasn't stupid or superficial - she was a character.
And a note on Dexter: yes. One of the reasons I love Sarah Dessen is because her leading men are not carbon copies and are not the typical hero of a YA romance.
So, yes.
*ends of my contribution to your contribution of my soapbox*
Yes, all your points are swell. The only reason I dislike Peeta's character change is because to me, it felt like Collins just wanted to give his character more flaws because he was TOO NICE and it was becoming uninteresting, at least to some minds.
ReplyDelete